000			03341nam a22002171i 4500
001			17926
010			_a0-551-01687-6
090			_a17926
100			_a20160923 |||y0rusy50
101			_aeng
200	1		_aNaming the powers _eLanguage of power in the New Testament _fWink, W.
210			_as. l. _cMarshall Pickering _d1984
327			_aContens Preface Abbreviations 1. Indetifying the powers 1. Introduction Power in its Mithological Context Preliminary Guidelines for Analyzing the Data 2. The Powers Arche and Archon Exousia Dynamis Thronos Kyriotes Onoma Angels FallenAngles, Evil Spirits, Demons Angels of the Nations 2. Disputed Passages 3. The New Testament Evidence 1 Corinthians 2: 6-8 Romans 13: 1-3 Romans 8:38-39 1 Corinthians 15: 24-27a Collosians 2:13-15 Ephesians 1:20-23 Colossians 2:9-10 Ephesians 2:1-2 Ephesians 6:12 Ephesians 3: 10 3 Interpreting the Powers 4. Toward an Interpretation 5. Interpreting the Myth The Powers are the inner aspect of material reality The Powers are Ignorant of God's Plan Heaven is the Transcendent within of material reality What Is Above Is Also Below The Way Up Is the Way Down Appendix 1: Archon and Arche Appendix 2: Exousia Appendix 3: Dynamis Appendix 4: Stoicheia in the Writings of the Early Christian Theologians Indexes
330			_aThe reader of this work will search in vain for a definition of power. It is one of those words that everyone understands perfectly well until asked to define it. Our use of the term 'power' is laden with assumptions drawn from the contemporary materialistic worldview. Whereas the ancients always understood power as the confluence of both spiritual and material factors, we tend to see it as primarily material. We do not think in terms of spirits, ghosts, demons, or gods as the effective agents of powerful effects in the world. Thus a gulf has been fixed between us and the biblical writers. We use the same words but project them into a wholly different world of meanings. What they meant by power and what we mean are incommensurate. If our goal is to understand the New Testament's conception of the Powers, we cannot do so simply by applying our own modern sociological categories of power. We must instead attend carefully and try to grasp what the people of that time might have meant by power, within the linguistic field of their own worldview and mythic systems. "I will argue that the "principalities and powers" are the inner and outer aspects of any given manifestation of power. As the inner aspect they are the spirituality of institutions, the "within" of corporate structures and systems, the inner essence of outer organizations of power. As the outer aspect they are political systems, appointed officials, the "chair" of an organization, lawsin short, all the tangible manifestations which power takes. This hypothesis, it seems to me, makes sense of the fluid way the New Testament writers and their contemporaries spoke of the Powers, now as if they were these centurions or that priestly hierarchy, and then, with no warning, as if they were some kind of spiritual entities in the heavenly places."
676			_a225.07
676			_a225
676			_a220.07
686			_2ddc
700			_aWink, W.
801			_aUA _bUA-KiUET _c20190516
942			_cBOOK _h225.07 _vWIN _m/1//1 _j225.07 WIN /1//1 _2ddc _n0